Master in Finance Application Essay Sample

Master in Finance Application Essay SampleAn important part of the application process is writing an essay on your Master in Finance application. Whether you are applying for a graduate or undergraduate program, it is a requirement to pass. The essays are written to answer a specific question and give more information about yourself, the degree, and why you want to be a finance professional. When completing this application, be sure to have a thorough understanding of how your essay will be evaluated.In most programs, finance is a broad subject that covers business, accounting, economics, and management. Master's graduates of an MBA or financial management program may also focus on a specific area, such as banking, commodities, equities, international finance, international trade, and insurance. Additionally, it can vary by school, but the focus is usually on the candidate's knowledge and experience, as well as professional goals. After answering the selection question on what you ho pe to gain from a finance degree, the essay comes next.The essay is considered part of the application and can only be used once. The essay is to be an individual reflection, and should address the major points of the application. There are many factors that may influence how the applicant will be selected for admission, including scores on the SAT and ACT, grades, extracurricular activities, and recommendations. In addition, it must also be typed and pasted correctly, and must be at least 500 words.As the application process goes through the selection process, the essay sample will be analyzed and studied thoroughly. This is where experience and knowledge of finance and other related subjects will help. Even if it seems like common sense, writing a cohesive essay should be simple and straight forward. With practice, the applicant will improve their ability to organize their thoughts, communicate them accurately, and write concisely.It is a given fact that the complete application i s the first thing that is seen by the admissions committee. This means that there is a greater need for writing proficiency than any other part of the application. The applicant's resume and transcript must match the essay format in order to be considered. A well written, structured, and comprehensive application is the perfect combination of preparation and performance.Financial writing is the language of finance. The process includes planning, presentation, editing, research, and rewriting. It can be an overwhelming prospect, but with good direction and practice, the student will enjoy creating a masterpiece.The process starts with the application itself. The student writes his or her profile, beginning with the academic details. It is a good idea to consult an editor before beginning the essay. They can offer suggestions to help make the essay easier to write and to write with a professional voice.If this step is skipped, the student may use a calculator or other exact numbers, b ut most banks and colleges require both precise and approximate information. Some students have trouble thinking outside of the box, but this is a helpful process to work through. The key is to gather information, consolidate it, and understand the flow of information required to write an essay, as well as how the bank and college would handle it.

The Electoral College System Is One Which Is Criticized Often. In Most

The electoral college system is one which is criticized often. In most of the countries in the world their leader is chosen by popular vote. This was true even in communist countries, although many times only one candidate runs sometime. This system of popular vote is not used in the United States, the country that is supposed to be the most democratic. The Electoral College, the constitutional system for the election of the president and vice president of the United States. It is the collective name for a group of electors, nominated by political parties within the states and popularly elected, who meet to vote for those two offices. Each party within a state selects a slate of electors numerically equal to the state's congressional delegation. The electors normally pledge to vote for the nominees of their party, but they are not constitutionally required to do so. When the American people vote for president and vice president, they are actually voting for slates of electors pledged to their candidates. Because the electors usually are chosen at large, the electoral vote of each state is cast as a unit, and the victorious presidential and vice presidential nominees in each state win the state's entire electoral vote. The candidates receiving a majority of the total electoral vote in the United States are elected. The electoral college system was established in ArticleII, section I, of the U. S. Constitution and has been modified mainly by the 12th Amendment. Numerous plans have been proposed for eliminating or altering the electoral college, including direct election of the president and vice president by popular vote. It extremely ironic that the what is supposed to be the most democratic government in the world, does not choose a president according to what the majority of the people want. The electoral college system generally gives all of a state's electoral votes to the winner in that state, no matter how slim the margin. Thus it has happened that candidates have been elected even though they received fewer popular votes than their opponents. Both Rutherford B. Hayes in 1876, and Benjamin Harrison, in 1888, were elected in this manner. In the case of Hayes, a special electoral commission was called in 1877 to decide the contested returns. John Quincy Adams also received fewer popular votes than his opponent, Andrew Jackson, in the election of 1824, but his election was decided by the House of Representatives because Jackson failed to win a majority of electoral college votes. On several occasions the popular vote pluralities of the electoral college victors have been razor thin or even questionable. One instance was the election of John F. Kennedy over Richard M. Nixon in 1960. The feature of the electoral college most prone to attack is the requirement that the election go into the House of Representatives to determine the president and into the senate to determine the vice-president if the electoral college fails to reach a majority. There might be a paralyzing delay in determining the victors, and the president-elect and vice president-elect could be members of opposing political parties. The House was called upon to elect a president in the cases of Jefferson and John Quincy Adams, and the Senate chose Richard M. Johnson as vice president after the election of 1836. The possibility of this happening again remains very much alive. Should a third-party candidate carry enough states to prevent an electoral vote majority for any candidate, the House, voting by state delegation, might be prevented from reaching an absolute majority. Pledged electors generally have been regarded as legally free to cast their votes as they choose, and there have been cases of defection from pledged positions. No such deviation has had a clear effect on an election result, but the possibility raises an additional objection to the electoral college. In 1820 a New Hampshire elector voted for John Quincy Adams instead of James Monroe; in 1956 an Alabama elector voted for a circuit judge instead of Adlai E. Stevenson; in 1960 an Oklahoma elector pledged to Richard Nixon voted instead for Harry F. Byrd; in 1968 a North Carolina elector defected from Nixon to George C. Wallace; and in 1988 a West Virginia elector voted for Lloyd M. Bentsen, Jr. instead of Michael S. Dukakis. Because of this I will shown that the following, although improbable example is possble to happen. If every single voter in the country unanimously chose "candidate A" for president, the electors pledged to him still may rally against